A disheartening experience with Dr. Lawrence Krauss

I recently attended the Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism (NECSS). It was generally a wonderful experience. I loved meeting many of the people I have conversed with online in the real world and also meeting with many of my skeptical heroes ( I’m looking at you, SGU crew, George Hrab,Dr. Cady Coleman, and Julia Galef). But, I was also witness to a a bit of the disreputable side of our movement.

I introduce you to Dr. Lawrence Krauss. A prominent physicist and popular science communicator. Also, in my recent personal experience watching him talk at NECSS, a bit of a self absorbed curmudgeon. He also, in my opinion, is more than a bit sexist.

During his keynote speech, Dr. Krauss was correct in all of his science and physics,yet he came across as dismissive of the intelligence of the assembled crowd. With repeated statements like, “if you had paid attention in geometry class…” and, “had you listened to your physics teacher, you would remember this formula…”, I found him distasteful at the least and offensive at the most. Granted, we all might not have his aptitude to grasp physics at the level that Dr. Krauss can, but to demean his sympathetic audience? Not needed. Being smart does not give you license to be a smart ass.

The next day, He was the guest host of Rationally Speaking with Dr. Massimo Pigliucci and Julia Galef. This is where I had my biggest point of contention with Dr. Krauss. He all but ignored the two hosts. Dr. Pigliucci got polite (but sparse) conversation. Julia though, got none of this. Dr. Krauss either ignored her questions, only allowed her to get only barely into her question, or was nodding/shaking his head during her questions. It seemed to me, he was only tolerating her. I have listened to Julia during all of the RS podcasts. She is not worthy of dismissing and often asks questions that are true insights into the given subjects.

What really brought all of these thoughts into focus was my delving into the Skeptics Guide to the Universe archives.  The SGU crew had Dr. Krauss as a guest on episode #124. While listening to him speak back then, I can see why he became a popular science communicator. But it is amazing to see what seven years and popularity can do to a person.

 

Contributor: Jonathan Tindell

A native Floridian living in Pennsylvania, eight year veteran of the United States Maine Corp that is in support of responsible gun control, and salesperson in the Oil and Gas industry that believes in climate change, Jonathan is almost the definition of a dichotomy.

See his full bio!

Thank you for reading Rationality Unleashed! You can “like” us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter @rationalityunle. For any questions, concerns, or comments beyond what can be placed in the comments section of the blog, email us at admin@rationalityunleashed.net.

Advertisements

One thought on “A disheartening experience with Dr. Lawrence Krauss

  1. Krauss is not as smart as you give him credit for. He constantly talks over people to hide his own weaknesses in certain areas.. For example, he cannot answer this question with a scientific response: From where did the first living organism (cell) evolve and how did it evolve? The answer you get from Kraus is “It doesn’t matter”,which is his de facto response when he does not understand a topic, yet, he will mock those who do present theories regarding the beginning of life. He has looked very bad debating the likes of Dinesh D’Souza, who mops the floor with him when Dinesh uses non-scientific arguments as valid argument styles. What Krauss does in cases like this is he talks over his debate opponent, not allowing them to get a word in edgewise, and somehow he believes this helps his cause. To me it just shows his ignorance outside of the physics realm.

    You see, people like Krauss do not help the cause of atheism. In fact, because he is so arrogant and obnoxious, even atheists are concerned about how atheists in general are perceived because he claims to represent them.

    Krauss claims that physicists conduct experiments to validate or invalidate a theory. Well, which experiment has resulted in the direct observation of a black hole? The answer, there is no such experiment and no black hole has ever been directly observed, ever, yet physicists claim all kinds of things based on their mathematical model of a black hole. Guess what, you can build a mathematical model for any hair-brained theory that you might have, and you can tweak the model based on any criterion that you feel appropriate. What physicists have done is simply created a set of mathematical models to explain their theories, but many of those models have never been validated by direct observation of phenomenon, either in real time in space, or in the lab.

Unleash your input

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s